What two categories are used to identify combat tracking indicators?

• A. Visible and hidden
• B. Observable and unobservable
• C. Direct and indirect
• D. Tangible and intangible

Answer: (B)

The identification of combat tracking indicators is essential for effective situational awareness and intelligence gathering on the battlefield. When categorizing these indicators, the terms 'observable' and 'unobservable' are utilized to differentiate between what can be seen and directly perceived versus what may not be immediately visible but can still provide critical insights.

Observable indicators are those that can be directly seen, such as footprints, discarded equipment, or physical traces left behind by individuals. These indicators provide clear, tangible evidence of recent activity or movements.

In contrast, unobservable indicators involve more subtle or indirect clues that may not be immediately apparent. These could include signs of recent activity, such as disturbances in vegetation, changes in animal behavior, or secondary evidence that suggests movement patterns without directly revealing them. Understanding these two categories allows military personnel, especially snipers and tracker units, to make informed decisions based on a comprehensive analysis of the environment.

Therefore, the correct answer emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between these two types of indicators, enhancing operational effectiveness in tracking and engaging with targets in combat scenarios.